NEWSgrist: *<electronetwork>* Vol.4, no.10 (May. 19,
2003)
============================
============================
NEWSgrist
where spin is art
{bi-weekly news digest}
============================
Vol.4, no.10 (May. 19, 2003)
============================
============================
CONTENTS:
- *Splash* <electronetwork>
- *NEWSgrist’s
Underbelly* post your own
- *Quote/s* Schlock + awe; He followed the money
- *Url/s* Who is
Ali G?; Postcard for the Public Domain
- *A Must Have* order your "Run Bush Run" pins…
- *Danger Lurks* Toying w/ Tuymans
- *Cracker Hackdown* DARPA and the Matrix?
- *Final Fantasy* Mirapaul on the Digital
"Sal-yawn"
- *At Whit's End*
Max Anderson resigns
- *The Walker's Boot* The Walker Art Center cuts staff
- *G
Whiz* So, who IS Ali G?
- *Open Call* Subtle Tech proposals
- *Book Grist* Does the totalitarian shoe fit?
- *Obit* Robert
Blackburn, 1920-2003
============================
============================
*Splash* http://newsgrist.net
<electronetwork>
"raising public awareness
of electromagnetic matter, energy,
& information"
Electronetwork.org is being redesigned and retooled to
automate and
to increase functionality using new scripting and database
capabilities.
Thank you for visiting. Please tell your friends and
colleagues about
splash archived at: http://www.newsgrist.net/Splash_EM.html
============================
============================
*NEWSgrist’s Underbelly*
Check for new posts, or post your own news, press
releases,
urls, opinions, rants, in the Underbelly : http://pub11.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=870870569
============================
============================
*Quote/s*
1)
But
while critiquing grandiosity, he admits to some awe. That footage of
soldiers in Hummers blazing across the
desert in the first days of the
war: "Vulgar, yet you couldn't take
your eyes off it," says LaVerdiere.
"Those gestures need to be examined.
It's about the artifice, too, the
way we relate to mediated experiences…"
Julian
Laverdiere, quoted by C. Carr in "Empire of Signs," May 2, 2003
The Village Voice, http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0319/carr.php
2)
Lombardi was on a mission: He
wanted to right wrongs by revealing
them. Instead of critiquing the
system, like so many contemporary
conceptualists, or journeying to
other psychic dimensions like shamans,
Lombardi assumed the personas of the grand inquisitor, the
private
investigator, and the lone reporter. He followed the
money.
--Jerry Saltz, "Dark Star," May 14, 2003, Artnet
Magazine,
http://www.artnet.com/Magazine/features/saltz/saltz5-14-03.asp?C=1
============================
============================
*Url/s*
1) Who is Ali G?
(see *G Whiz* below)
2)
Postcard for the Public Domain
- prepared by Jay Worthington; design by Luke Murphy.
http://cabinetmagazine.org/issues/10/publicdomainpostcard.php
[Includes pdf versions (front and back) and Flash
interactive].
On 15 January 2003, in Eldred v. Ashcroft, the United
States Supreme
Court rejected a constitutional challenge to the 1998
Copyright Term
Extension Act (a.k.a. the Sonny Bono Act) that had been
brought by a
coalition of online, academic,
and public domain publishers. At stake was
the future growth of the public
domainthe body of work which is freely
available for use by the public
without license or fee. Under the Sonny
Bono Act, now secure as the law
of the land, growth in the public
domain will be virtually
nonexistent until 2018.
Cabinet decided to compare the public domain we now have
with the
one which would have existed had Congress not begun the
series of
copyright extensions (starting in the 1960s) that
culminated with the
1998 act. This chart graphically depicts the price paid by
the public for
those extensions. By 2030, a
total of fourteen and a half million works
which would otherwise have
passed into the public domain will remain
restricted by copyright. In
other words, by 2030 the public domain will
be less than half the size that
it would have been under the copyright
laws of just a few decades ago.
The chart also vividly demonstrates
that the bulk of this giveaway
happened long before the 1998 legislation
that was challenged in the
Eldred case.
We have printed the results on this oversized postcard so
that you can
cut it out and tack it to your
wall or mail it to your friends. Better yet, if
Congress tries to extend the term of copyright yet again,
write an angry
note on the back and mail it to your Representative.
Sources: Barbara Ringer, Study No. 31, Renewal of
Copyright (June,
1960); Martin A. Roberts,
Records in the Copyright Office Deposited by
the United States District
Courts Covering the Period 1790-1870
(1939); Annual Report of the
Register of Copyrights, 2001, Appendix:
Registrations, 1790-2001 (2001).
Two simplifying assumptions were
made in the preparation of this
chart: only works registered with the
copyright office were included,
and all works were assumed to be
protected for the period granted
to corporate copyright holders. Neither
assumption should meaningfully
affect the results.
Copyright 2003 Cabinet Magazine, which grants permission
to anyone
to reproduce this chart and accompanying text so long as
proper
attribution is given to Cabinet Magazine, Jay Worthington,
and Luke
Murphy. Additional copies are
available in PDF format at http://www.cabinetmagazine.org
============================
============================
*A Must Have*
"Run Bush Run" pin: Price: $1.50
http://www.mrlady.com/Store/goods.htm
2004 Prez Campaign Button from
Dyke Action Machine! (DAM!)
(actual
size 1" diameter) From Buttons to Bustiers, it's time to suit up for
future
demos. Dyke Action Machine!'s 2004 Campaign Button is primed to
replace
that old-time feeling of your vintage activist regalia. Don't delay!
You're
really going to wish you had one of these once the coming mud-
slinging
season starts up. Dyke Action Machine! is the New York City-
based
public art collaboration of Carrie Moyer and Sue Schaffner.
http://www.dykeactionmachine.com or info@dykeactionmachine.com
============================
============================
*Danger
Lurks*
Luc Tuymans
@
DAVID ZWIRNER
525 West 19th Street
April 24-May 21
ArtForum online, May 9, 2003
Picks -- Michael Wilson
http://www.artforum.com/picks/place=New%20York#picks4700
The sense that disaster might be
lurking around the corner--very much
in the air these days--is as
prevalent as ever in Luc Tuymans's starkly
beautiful new work. The Belgian painter's
fusion of the banal and dingy
with the unspoken threat of
violence may have become familiar, but it
retains the power to unsettle.
Ambiguities of scale and perspective turn
a patterned carpet into a
distant military installation and an SUV driver
into a boxed-in, cringing
prisoner, while what appears at first to be a
rendering of an obscure board
game reveals itself as a paintball battle.
Tuymans's hovering viewpoints,
close-cropped compositions, bruised
palette, and nervy wet-on-wet
application lend objects, figures, and
spaces an aura of silent danger.
Even omitting Eyeballs, 2003, in which
four pairs of disembodied eyes
are lined up like coat buttons, these are
pictures that return our gaze,
often with suspicion and sometimes with
malice.
NYTimes, Art In Review, May 9,
2003
ROBERTA SMITH
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/09/arts/design/09GALL.html
The postmodern Romanticism of
the Belgian painter Luc Tuymans has
been influential, and it is easy
to see why. At once seductive and
sinister, nondescript and
suggestive, his muted photo-based paintings
leaven the icy image-mongering
of Gerhard Richter with the personal
sensibility of painters from
Manet to Brice Marden. In other words, the
works play it both ways,
confirming the age of mechanical reproduction
while squeezing past its
restrictions.
This approach can seem formulaic at times, not the least
because Mr.
Tuymans continues to adhere to the Conceptual yet diaristic
ploy of
never working on a painting for
more than one day. Still, his fifth gallery
show in New York suggests that
his workdays may be getting longer,
which is to the good. His new
paintings (all from 2003) still look almost
like nothing, then something,
and then something else, noncommittally
conjuring scenes from movies,
newspaper photographs and snapshots,
often with crime-scene
overtones. Two are fudgy, purple-y nocturnes;
others are washed out, almost
overexposed grisailles pervaded by
silvery whites and grays.
"Frank," an image of a scowling man lost behind
the wheel of a big car,
might almost be a snowy scene from the movie
"Fargo," but it isn't. A
horizontal expanse of fluffy white diamond shapes that
resemble highly
organized clouds is simply titled "Carpet."
"Frozen" depicts the heavily
gloved hand of an industrial worker gripping the handle of
a carton in a
palette of Monetesque pinks, lavenders, grays and whites.
(You can bet
that's not ice cream.)
The jarringly titled "Eyeballs" initially
suggests a close-up of a double-
breasted jacket — a bit of milk-chocolate suede or velvet
dotted with
parallel rows of buttonlike spheres. The pale coral,
butter and brown
tones of "Mayhem,"
which is based on a wide-angle overview of a paint
-ball arena (from a guns and
ammo magazine), brings to mind a pulled
-apart still-life, maybe by
Morandi, until you grasp the title, scale and
intimations of mindless
violence.
These paintings gather force more decisively than Mr.
Tuymans's
previous efforts, and still fall
apart when you look at them really closely.
Pitting the painting's
flimsiness against its powers of transformation
more evocatively than before,
they mitigate the alienation of everyday
life with a layer of lightly
dabbed-on oil paint that signifies human
attention, and summons a
wondrous sense of light without really
covering up much.
============================
============================
*Cracker Hackdown*
Defense
agency pulls OpenBSD funding
By Robert Lemos
CNET News.com, April 18, 2003, 5:00 AM PT
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-997429.html
The unused portion of a grant from the Defense Advanced Research
Projects
Agency to fund development of the open-source operating
system
OpenBSD has been pulled for unspecified reasons.
The project´s leader, Theo de Raadt, said Thursday he was informed by
email that the remaining portion of the $2.3 million grant has been
pulled. An e-mail from a professor who is managing the grant did not
provide a reason, but de Raadt said he believes the cancellation was
prompted by concerns about the money going to too many foreign
developers
and to antiwar statements that de Raadt made to reporters.
"They decided that they didn´t want (our project) anymore," de Raadt
said
Thursday, less than hour after he received notification. "This is it.
It´s
over."
DARPA, the arm of the U.S. Department of Defense that funds research
and
development and is best known for funding the project that later
became
the Internet, awarded the grant in 2001 as part of its
Composable
High-Assurance Trusted Systems (CHATS) projects, said
de
Raadt.
About $1 million had been allotted to add new security features to
OpenBSD, an open-source OS that many consider to be the most
secure
free implementation of a Unix-like system. The project had
finished
most of the work in the first three months of the grant and
had
been recently using the money to fund more security
enhancements
to the software, de Raadt said at a recent security
conference.
A University of Pennsylvania computer science professor, Jonathan
Smith,
had originally applied for the grant under the title, "Portable
Open-Source Security Enhancements," or POSSE. About $500,000 of
the
money went to several U.K. researchers to do a vulnerability analysis
on
OpenSSL, a widely used program for encrypting communications,
especially
to and from Web sites. A handful of flaws were found,
de Raadt said.
Smith refused to comment on the funding, citing the
sensitivity of the
issue. An e-mail to the POSSE project´s DARPA representative wasn´t
answered.
Earlier this week, de Raadt said he was told that officials from DARPA
were concerned about statements appearing in press reports that
indicated
most of the grant was being funneled to foreign researchers,
an
apparent no-no for government-funded projects. Moreover,
de Raadt
believed that the U.S. government took exception to
comments
he made indicating that the money spent on his project
meant
that fewer cruise missiles were being built.
"In the U.S., today, free speech is just a myth," de Raadt said.
He estimated that about 85 percent of the money has already been
spent
and that the remaining portion would have continued the project
for
another six months. "The only money that I got was my salary,"
he
said.
With nearly 60 OpenBSD hackers traveling to Canada to take part in a
"hackathon"--a week´s worth of programming sessions--the project
now
finds itself about $30,000 short of the money it needs to house
the
attendees.
"We are left in the lurch very seriously...and will need to struggle to
keep our conference facilities in some way," de Raadt said.
The project plans to ship version 3.3 of the OpenBSD system on Friday.
An acknowledgment of the role that DARPA played, which was to
appear
on the back of the box, will instead be covered by a sticker,
he
said.
---------------------------------------------------------
[Other
DARPA news: May 14, 2003, posted at Metafilter.com:
http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/Solicitations/PIP_03-30.html
DARPA
looking for proposals to create the Matrix. "The Information
Processing
Technology Office (IPTO) of the Defense Advanced
Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) is soliciting proposals to develop
an
ontology-based (sub)system that captures, stores, and makes
accessible
the flow of one person’s experience in and interactions
with
the world in order to support a broad spectrum of associates/
assistants
and other system capabilities. The objective of this
"LifeLog"
concept is to be able to trace the "threads" of an individual's
life
in terms of events, states, and relationships."]
---------------------------------------------------------
============================
============================
*Final Fantasy*
ARTS ONLINE
Computer-Driven Fantasy at the Financial
Center
By MATTHEW MIRAPAUL
NYTimes May 5, 2003
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/05/arts/design/05MIRA.html
Hours before the April 22
opening of the New York Digital Salon art
exhibition, Alex Galloway was
making sure that "Carnivore," his
Internet-based artwork, was
running properly. Once or twice a minute,
as designed, it would splash a
bold streak of color across a large
computer screen. A passer-by
stopped to watch, and when the screen
did not change for an extended
time, she asked, "Is it working?" Mr.
Galloway replied, "You have
to be patient."
Visitors to the Digital Salon
have been even more patient. The salon,
organized by the School of
Visual Arts in New York, has changed little
since the first exhibition in
1993. Although the salon has grown from a
small display of digital prints
into an annual showcase for dozens of Web
sites, animated videos and other
computer-generated works, many of
the same artists were "hung"
year after year, making a dynamic genre
seem static. As a result, the
salon has never produced much excite-
ment, even among its artists. As
one recently said of this annual gallery
and Web exhibition, it has been
the "Digital Sal-yawn."
So for the salon's 10th anniversary its organizers decided
to abandon
the annual open-call format in which jurors would sift
through 1,000
recent works and choose the best. Instead the salon
invited 10 new-
media curators to review the genre's history and select the
10 works
that they each considered to be benchmarks. The list, sort
of a 100-
piece starter set for the digital-art canon, was published
last fall in the
electronic-arts magazine
Leonardo. (The magazine's contents, including
the curators' essays, are on the
salon's Web site, at
http://www.nydigitalsalon.org)
Bruce Wands, the salon's director, said, "The public
isn't really sure
what digital art is yet." Ideally the salon
selections would tell people
exactly what it is. To show them, 19 of the works can be
viewed in the
salon exhibition, "Vectors: Digital Art of Our
Time," at the Courtyard
Gallery of the World Financial Center in Lower Manhattan
through May
25.
Is it working? Well, no. If the salon's goal is to
introduce audiences to
important works in digital-art history, gallery visitors
are more likely
to leave wondering why these were chosen. Except for a
confusing
color-coded timeline near the entry and a handout that
describes rather
than interprets the works, viewers take an unguided tour.
And because
the works are arranged neither chronologically nor by
genre, there is
little sense of how the art has
progressed or become diverse.
Nor does it help that only a fraction of the roughly 100
artworks is on
display. Mr. Wands said that to show all of them would
have cost nearly
$1 million, and plans for a
comprehensive exhibition had to be cut when
fund-raising became difficult after 9/11. Still, there are
some curious
choices among the included works. For instance
"Apartment" by Martin
Wattenberg and Marek Walczak was exhibited at the Whitney
Museum
in 2001 and can be viewed on the
Internet. So, why show it again,
when Char Davies's
virtual-reality works, favored by two curators, have
not been in New York since 1995?
Similarly, Mr. Galloway's "Carnivore" deserved
better treatment. As he
conceived it the piece monitors electronic exchanges
between
computers, then uses various
artists' software to convert them into
works that can actually be seen
or heard. One of the aims of
"Carnivore" is to show
how different digital artists use the same raw
material to get different
results. Yet Mr. Galloway's interpretation is the
only one being exhibited. Which
is somewhat like going to the "Matisse
Picasso" exhibition and
then just looking at the Picassos.
What's really missing in an exhibition with 10 diverse
curatorial
contributors is a firm organizing hand. The World Financial
Center's
gallery may be lovely as corporate office space goes, but
it is far from
ideal for exhibiting media art. Save your visit for a
rainy day, when
sunlight won't wash out the atrium's computer screens.
Timothy Druckrey, an independent curator in New York and
editor of
"Ars Electronica: Facing
the Future" (M.I.T. Press, 2001), a history of
the 25-year-old European
electronic-arts festival, said that skimpy
support for new-media art in the
United States made it nearly
impossible for cultural
institutions here to mount effective
retrospectives. They simply
don't have the history to support them.
It is probably telling that none
of the works from any of the nine
previous salons was considered
good enough to make the greatest-hits
lists for the 10th salon.
Mr. Druckrey said that in Europe exhibitions were based on
decades of
commissions and encouragement for new-media art rather
than a
sudden shift from open-call
competitions. "To attempt to leap into
legitimacy in this way demonstrates
the woeful condition of media art in
the United States," he said
of the Digital Salon.
Mr. Wands, who is also director of the graduate
computer-art
department at the School of
Visual Arts, said he was disappointed with
the salon's budget-induced
limits. He urged visitors to view this year's
salon as a group of events,
including a recent two-day symposium and
some concerts, rather than as a
single exhibition. He expressed hope
that the show's traveling
version would be larger.
Because of the amount of effort involved in developing
this year's salon,
the 11th edition will not be held until the fall of 2005.
By then it may
have a harder time attracting an audience. Several
competing groups
are discussing the possibility of holding festivals in New
York and
California like the Ars
Electronica event in Linz, Austria.
At the same time the biannual Boston Cyberarts Festival is
building
momentum. The third festival opened there on April 26 and
runs
through Sunday. Since 1999 its director, George Fifield,
has corralled
60 diverse cultural institutions
in the Boston area into presenting
exhibitions and concerts that
coincide with festival events. The festival
has a vibrancy that the salon
sorely lacks. (A schedule is at
"The artists of the future will have never known a
world without
computers," Mr. Wands said during his opening remarks
for the salon.
The Digital Salon has had 10 years
to establish itself as an important
forum for the digital arts, but
so far it has squandered the opportunity.
Will the Digital Salon's
visitors stay patient? Or will they, like Mr.
Galloway's passer-by, simply walk away?
============================
============================
*At Whit's End*
Director of the Whitney Resigns
By CAROL VOGEL
NYTimes, May 13, 2003
[excerpted]
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/13/arts/design/13WHIT.html
Maxwell L. Anderson, director of
the Whitney Museum of American Art,
resigned Monday after a
tumultuous five years in the post, the museum
announced.
Rumors of trouble between Mr.
Anderson and the Whitney's board had
been circulating around the
gossipy art world for some time. Mr.
Anderson said in a statement
that it had "become clear in recent
months that the board and I have
a different sense of the Whitney's
future, in both the scale of its
ambitions and the balance of its
programming."
Leonard A. Lauder, the museum's
chairman, agreed. "Max is a brilliant
man of many talents," Mr.
Lauder said in an interview. "It is unfortunate
that there wasn't a perfect
match of his skills and ambitions and that of
the Whitney's."
Mr. Anderson, speaking by phone,
said he was particularly disappointed
when the board abandoned its
plans to build a $200 million expansion
designed by the Rotterdam-based
architect Rem Koolhaas. When the
project was officially scrapped
last month, museum officials said they
were concerned that the building
would have been too expensive to
operate let alone build in the
current economic climate.
"We are trustees of a
nonprofit organization," Mr. Lauder said. "We had
to be prudent."
But Mr. Anderson called the
issue of the building's expense debatable.
[…]
============================
============================
*The Walker's Boot*
MINNEAPOLIS: INTERNET ART LAYOFFS
By MATTHEW MIRAPAUL
NYTimes, May 13, 2003
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/13/arts/13ARTS.html
The Walker Art Center in Minneapolis, which has been a
strong
supporter of Internet art, has
dismissed the curator for its online art
projects. Steve Dietz, the
center's new-media curator, and six other
Walker staff members were laid
off in a cost-cutting move that is
expected to save more than $1
million annually, officials there said
last week. Although the Walker
is proceeding with a $90 million
expansion scheduled to open in
2005, the center's director, Kathy
Halbreich, said plans to build a
digital-art gallery would be deferred
for at least five years. Magda
Sawon, director of Postmasters Gallery,
a new-media gallery in Chelsea,
Manhattan, said Mr. Dietz "was the
most active, innovative and
accomplished curator of new media in
this country." Under Mr.
Dietz, who joined the Walker in 1996, the
center has vigorously supported
the notion of the Internet as a
creative medium by commissioning
a series of online-only artworks
and organizing several Web-based
exhibitions. Mr. Dietz also acquired
äda'web, an important collection
of early Internet art, for the center's
Web site http://www.walkerart.org . Ms. Halbreich
said she intended
to keep the projects online but
could not commit to doing so until the
cost was determined.
and more:
Walker Art Center cuts staff by 5 percent
BY DOMINIC P. PAPATOLA
Pioneer Press, May. 08, 2003
http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/entertainment/5809781.htm
Walker Art Center announced the layoffs of 5 percent of
its staff
Wednesday afternoon, becoming the latest local arts organization
forced to downsize in difficult
economic times.
The Minneapolis museum said it would lay off seven members
of its
staff of 149 full- and part-time
workers. The cuts came at all levels and
included Steve Dietz, the
center's director of New Media Initiatives. The
Walker was one of the first art centers in the country to
have a
curatorial position in the
nascent artistic field of new media.
[…]
============================
============================
*G Whiz*
Is You Wicked?
By MAUREEN DOWD
NYTimes, May 7, 2003
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/07/opinion/07DOWDD.html
James Baker, the former secretary of state who helped make
two
Bushes president, the first by sniping
at Massachusetts, the second by
snatching away Florida, is an
extremely careful man.
A dignified diplomat with a deep fear of ridicule, Mr.
Baker always keeps
his suit jacket and his public utterances buttoned.
That is why I was dumbfounded one recent night to see him
being
interviewed on HBO by a hip-hop guy wearing fatigues,
shades, a
skullcap and bling-bling and
talking like a British gangsta/Rasta rapper.
The young man was asking a skeptical and increasingly
impatient Mr.
Baker whether it was wise for
Iraq and Iran to have such similar names.
YOUNG MAN: Isn't there a real danger that someone give a
message
over the radio to one of them
fighter pilots, saying, `Bomb Ira--' and
the geezer doesn't heard it properly
and bombs Iran instead of Iraq?
MR. BAKER: No danger.
YOUNG MAN: How does you make countries do stuff you want?
MR. BAKER: Well, the way you deal with countries on
foreign policy
issues. . . is you deal with
carrots and sticks.
YOUNG MAN: But what country is gonna want carrots, even if
it's like a
million tons of carrots that you're giving over there--
MR. BAKER: Well, carrots
I'm not using the term literally. You might
send foreign aid money, money.
YOUNG MAN: Well, money's better than carrots. Even if a
country love
carrots and that is, like, their favorite national food,
if they get given
them--
MR. BAKER: Well, don't get hung up on carrots. That's just
a figure of
speech.
YOUNG MAN: So would you ever send carrots? You know, is
there any
situation
MR. BAKER: No, no.
YOUNG MAN: What about if there was a famine?
MR. BAKER: Carrots, themselves? No.
The interview was a hilarious
classic in the seldom-seen subgenre of
international relations humor.
Mr. Baker could outfox Al Gore but not Ali G. The
31-year-old British
satirist, whose new HBO show has already become a cult
favorite
among high school and college kids, came to America to do
the same
sort of interviews he did in
England, putting unwitting V.I.P.'s on the
spot.
With his white-gangsta-rapper-wannabe persona, Sacha Baron
Cohen,
a brilliant graduate of
Cambridge, sends up the vacuity of the culture in
an era when putting people on TV
who attract the right demographic is
more important than putting
people on TV who know what they're
talking about.
But the interviews depend on the subject's not recognizing
Ali G or even
realizing that he's a comedian.
Ali G scammed Mr. Baker and others into granting
interviews by sending
them flattering letters on fancy stationery from United
World
Productions, inviting them to be
part of a six-part series for Channel 4
on British TV aimed at
explaining the U.S. Constitution to young people.
With his crew, Mr. Cohen went into Mr. Baker's conference
room in a
dark suit and put on his garish
Ali G outfit before Mr. Baker came in.
As in England, Mr. Cohen has left a trail of irritated
interviewees in his
wacky wake.
Marlin Fitzwater had his doubts when Ali G showed up
wearing a red
jumpsuit and high-tops and asked inane questions. Like Mr.
Baker, Mr.
Fitzwater figured that Ali G was dressing for his
"hippie" audience. But
he ended the interview after Ali G asked him whether
Hillary Clinton
drank "from the fairy
cup."
"I said, `You're an idiot,' " Mr. Fitzwater
recalled. "I'd never been lied
to like that. I was two steps away from calling the
sheriff."
Donald Trump, who walked out of an interview when Ali G
tried to pitch
the idea of a glove to eat ice
cream cones with, recalled: "I thought he
was seriously retarded. It was a
total con job. But my daughter, Ivanka,
saw it and thought it was very
cool."
James Woolsey was good-natured when Ali G brought up the
grassy
knoll and asked, "Who shot
J. R.?" Richard Thornburgh was patient
when Ali G misinterpreted the
meaning of hung juries. And Brent
Scowcroft didn't flinch when Ali
G asked him, "Did they ever catch the
people who sent Tampax through
the mail?"
"It was anthrax," Mr. Scowcroft corrected
pleasantly.
Ali G is wicked. And to him, that's a compliment.
more info: http://www.hbo.com/alig/?ntrack_para1=leftnav_category0_show9
============================
============================
*Open Call*
SUBTLE TECHNOLOGIES
BLURRING THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN ART and SCIENCE
Call for Curatorial Proposals
Deadline June 15th
Subtle Technologies is currently accepting curatorial
proposals.
Full information is available at
http://www.subtletechnologies.com/calls.html
The Subtle Technologies Festival welcomes submissions of
programming ideas from curators
and organizations that would like to
contribute to the festival.
These ideas could be for gallery shows,
performances, screenings and events relevant to the
festival's themes.
We encourage anyone interested
in making a submission to attend
Subtle Technologies 2003, or review our archives to get a
sense of
the topics we have covered in the past. Although we are
not limited
to these topics it will give you an overview of the
festival's
interests.
To have your programming proposal considered for next
year's
festival, we require submissions by June 15th 2003. Your
submission
should include a short curatorial statement, a preliminary
list of
content and your C.V. (max. 3 pages).
Please send your proposal to subtleprogramming@sympatico.ca
Visit our archives on the web at http://www.subtletechnologies.com
============================
============================
*Book Grist*
Terror and Liberalism
by Paul Berman
W.W. Norton & Company; (April 2003)
ISBN: 0393057755
From Publishers Weekly:
Berman puts his leftist
credentials (he's a member of the editorial board
of Dissent: http://www.dissentmagazine.org) on
the line by critiquing
the left while presenting a
liberal rationale for the war on terror, joining
a discourse that has been
dominated by conservatives. The most
original aspect of his analysis
is to categorize Islamism as a totalitarian
reaction against Western
liberalism in a class with Nazism and
communism; drawing on the ideas
of Camus in The Rebel, Berman